Once
the flatterers converge what are some of the problems that will arise around the
world. That is what we read about this week in, “The World is Flat”. We are
getting to the point in the reading where everything is coming together. Where the
flatteners are becoming tools to revolutionize the world. We are talking about
the triple convergence. Also in the reading some of the conflicts with outsourcing
particularly the India and Indiana case. Also we learned about intellectual property.
The
triple convergence starts with ten of the previous flatteners coming together
and being used together. Next is companies changing and or adapting to these
new changes. The last part I would say is to maintain the changing and adapting
of the new flatteners, stay up to date, keep training people for it. Hire new
people to do some of the new work that comes along with it. So why is the
triple convergence so important, Friedman uses the example of when they first
introduced computers to the work force, they thought that it would be an immediate
jump in productivity. That was not so, the people had to learn what they were
doing, they had to change how they worked. Just because you have the tools
doesn’t mean better results if the people using them don’t know how to use the
equipment or software or whatever it might be to the best of their abilities? This
requires training and keeping everyone up to date on updates.
When the state of Indiana decides it’s time to upgrade
the computer system, it needs to contract the work out. They receive the bids
from the potential companies. The lowest company is offering 8.1 million
dollars lower than the rest of the companies. It seems the obvious choice, but
government gets involved and wants to keep the work local instead of using the
cheaper way which would have saved so much more money. You wonder who was
exploited here, the people who are now paying probably more than that 8.1
million to divide the work load and divide it among smaller companies, or the
companies that just spent all the money training people to the best way of how
to upgrade and having no work for these people to do now. The problem both
sides lose, no one is winning, the state government just wasted all that money,
and India just lost the contract. The problem is I think if we are going to
commit to outsourcing just commit. It will save more money make us more
productive here at home in our own fields of study. When we play this game of
politics and switching because of public opinion all we are doing is losing
money that could have been better spend elsewhere.
Intellectual property is your idea on software. Such as
an app, or even your e-mail. This is important because this is where it all
starts. We need to make sure that people share their ideas and work together
while at the same time protecting the original inventor of the idea. We don’t want
people being closed off with their ideas. Ideas that could potentially be the
next success. I wouldn’t feel comfortable sharing my ideas with other people
knowing that any one of them could take the idea and try and change it or make
it better then what I was doing because they have better resources. We need to be able to trade mark and idea.
Which would prove to be very difficult.
I think your essay is very clearly because it goes in to the important point. I like the way you answer the questions in this essay, you give out the important point to help us see how you are answer the question. For example, "The problem both sides lose, no one is winning, the state government just wasted all that money, and India just lost the contract. The problem is I think if we are going to commit to outsourcing just commit. It will save more money make us more productive here at home in our own fields of study"
ReplyDeleteI agree with your point on marketing intellectual properties it is a rather difficult thing to do especially when you find those people who claim they thought up everything first, which is where it becomes a legal game on who gets the patent first. As for the issues with Indians vs Indianans it's difficult to make firm claim as it could be that giving the job to local companies may stimulate local growth which may give a better long term benefit to the area rather than what could be a short term benefit, personally I'd like to see more statistics on the matter, more often times than not there's more factors that play into such decisions. Though I agree canceling a contract right after you struck it is best to be avoided.
ReplyDelete